UPDATE: Coverage of the Cage Prisoners event in the UK in October 2012 w/ Robert King: Video and Writeup
![]() |
| Robert H. King of the Angola 3 and Hamja Ahsan in London. |
Do US Prisons Violate European Human Rights Law?
--An interview with Hamja Ahsan and Aviva Stahl
By Angola 3 News
On April 10, 2012, the European Court of Human
Rights (ECHR) issued judgement in the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v The United Kingdom, thereby making a
landmark ruling on the legitimacy of solitary confinement, extreme isolation
and life without parole in US supermax prisons (view ECHR press release
and ruling). The ECHR denied the appeal filed jointly by six appellants, consisting of four
British nationals (Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat, Syed Talha Ahsan, and Mustafa
Kamal Mustafa—aka Abu Hamza), an Egyptian national (Adel Abdul Bary) and a
Saudi Arabian national (Khaled Al-Fawwaz) who have been imprisoned in the United
Kingdom, pending extradition to the United States for alleged terrorism-related
activities.
This judgement is now being appealed to the ECHR’s
Grand Chamber, with a decision expected in September regarding whether or not
the appeal will be heard. Arguing against their extradition to the US, the six
appellants have asserted that the risk of imprisonment in the United States (with
specific citation of long-term isolation at the notorious federal prison in
Colorado, ADX Florence—also the subject of both
a June Senate Hearing and a recent civil rights lawsuit initiated
by prisoners alleging human rights violations there) would breach their right under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human
Rights not to "be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment." Ruling against the appellants, the ECHR argued
in their April 10 ruling that isolation in a US Supermax prison is “relative”
and will become a violation of Article 3 ECHR (which prohibits torture), only
if it extends indefinitely.
